RHINO T105 vs XORO MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2
On the EU energy label the XORO MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: RHINO T105 35/100, XORO MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2 35/100.
| RHINO T105 | XORO MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | G | G |
| Durability score | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 62.6 h | 95.8 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 4 |
| Drop reliability class | E | E |
| Repairability index | 2.81/5 | 3/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP52 | IP44 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 8 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 20 W | 18 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | T105 | MegaPAD 1333 Pro 2 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.