POCO C81 Pro vs TCL 605 (T517D)
On the EU energy label the POCO C81 Pro comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: POCO C81 Pro 46/100, TCL 605 (T517D) 46/100.
| POCO C81 Pro | TCL 605 (T517D) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 46/100 | 46/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 67.3 h | 49.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,880 mAh | 4,900 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 2.63/5 | 3.57/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 5 W | 33 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | 25128PC17Y | T517D |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.