PEAQ PET-10182-H332E vs TCL TAB 11 FE LTE
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: PEAQ PET-10182-H332E 42/100, TCL TAB 11 FE LTE 42/100.
| PEAQ PET-10182-H332E | TCL TAB 11 FE LTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | F | E |
| Durability score | 42/100 | 42/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 60 h | 83.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,820 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 25 | 8 |
| Drop reliability class | E | E |
| Repairability index | 3.59/5 | 3.08/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 7 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-A |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | PET 10182-H332E | 9465G |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.