Oukitel WP200 Pro (EPREL 2711244) vs realme C75 5G
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Oukitel WP200 Pro (EPREL 2711244) 63/100, realme C75 5G 63/100.
| Oukitel WP200 Pro (EPREL 2711244) | realme C75 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 86.3 h | 69.7 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,600 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 8,800 mAh | 5,660 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.57/5 | 3.58/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 45 W | 5 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | WP200 Pro | RMX3963 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.