Oukitel S109 RU vs vivo X300 FE (V2542)
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Oukitel S109 RU 52/100, vivo X300 FE (V2542) 36/100.
| Oukitel S109 RU | vivo X300 FE (V2542) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 52/100 | 36/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 106.8 h | 49.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 5,255 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | A | C |
| Repairability index | 2.76/5 | 2.93/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 7 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | WP22 | V2542 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.