Motorola Razr fold vs Oukitel WP200 Pro (EPREL 2711244)
On the EU energy label the Motorola Razr fold comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Motorola Razr fold 67/100, Oukitel WP200 Pro (EPREL 2711244) 63/100.
| Motorola Razr fold | Oukitel WP200 Pro (EPREL 2711244) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 67/100 | 63/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 59.3 h | 86.3 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,760 mAh | 8,800 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 95 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | C | A |
| Repairability index | 3.62/5 | 3.57/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 7 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP48 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | Yes | No |
| Charging power | 90 W | 45 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | razr fold (XT2651-1) | WP200 Pro |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.