Kodak WF238V (2026 registration) vs Shenzhen Anmite Technology A180W07H
The Kodak WF238V (2026 registration) uses 3 kWh less a year, about €1 a year at the EU average price.
| Kodak WF238V (2026 registration) | Shenzhen Anmite Technology A180W07H | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Annual consumption | 8.8 kWh | 12 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €2/year | €3/year |
| Type | monitor | monitor |
| Screen size | 24″ | 18″ |
| Screen size | 58 cm | 45.7 cm |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 px | 1920×1200 px |
| Panel | LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Power in SDR mode | 4 W | 5.5 W |
| Standby | 0.5 W | 0.2 W |
| Networked standby | 0 W | 0 W |
| Automatic brightness control | No | No |
| Software updates for at least | 3 years | 1 years |
| Spare parts for at least | 2 years | 1 years |
| Model numbers | WF238V | A180W07H |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.