Hotwav T7 Pro vs JCB Phone Toughphone E50
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Hotwav T7 Pro 50/100, JCB Phone Toughphone E50 51/100.
| Hotwav T7 Pro | JCB Phone Toughphone E50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | D | A |
| Durability score | 50/100 | 51/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 45.9 h | 60.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,100 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,280 mAh | 4,930 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 400 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.29/5 | 2.95/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 20 W | 30 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | T7 Pro | Toughphone E50 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.