Hotwav Note 13 vs vivo X Fold6
On the EU energy label the vivo X Fold6 comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Hotwav Note 13 35/100, vivo X Fold6 35/100.
| Hotwav Note 13 | vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | D | B |
| Durability score | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 35.9 h | 59 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 6,670 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 90 | 140 |
| Drop reliability class | C | B |
| Repairability index | 3.35/5 | 2.87/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP44 | IP58 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | Yes |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | Note 13 | V2559 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.