Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro vs TCL P80
On the EU energy label the Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro 62/100, TCL P80 62/100.
| Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro | TCL P80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | A |
| Durability score | 62/100 | 62/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 64.6 h | 58.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,800 mAh | 4,850 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.72/5 | 3.58/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 7 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 7 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 20 W | 45 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | Cyber 13 Pro | T853K |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.