Guangdong Songren Technology V240HQ vs Kodak WF238V (2026 registration)
The Kodak WF238V (2026 registration) uses 35 kWh less a year, about €10 a year at the EU average price.
| Guangdong Songren Technology V240HQ | Kodak WF238V (2026 registration) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | F | B |
| Annual consumption | 43.8 kWh | 8.8 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €12/year | €2/year |
| Type | monitor | monitor |
| Screen size | 24″ | 24″ |
| Screen size | 61 cm | 58 cm |
| Resolution | 1920×1080 px | 1920×1080 px |
| Panel | LCD | LCD |
| Refresh rate | 100 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Power in SDR mode | 20 W | 4 W |
| Power in HDR mode | 27 W | — |
| Energy class (HDR) | G | — |
| Standby | 0.5 W | 0.5 W |
| Networked standby | 0 W | 0 W |
| Automatic brightness control | No | No |
| Software updates for at least | 1 years | 3 years |
| Spare parts for at least | 1 years | 2 years |
| Model numbers | V240HQ | WF238V |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.