Crelander W30B vs POCO Pad M1
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Crelander W30B 58/100, POCO Pad M1 58/100.
| Crelander W30B | POCO Pad M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | G |
| Durability score | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 63.1 h | 103.3 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,300 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 11,800 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 208 |
| Drop reliability class | E | A |
| Repairability index | 3.52/5 | 2.74/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP55 | IP53 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 33 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | W30 | 2509ARPBDG |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.