Cepter ZTE Cepter Nivo V2 vs Xgody X32
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 1 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Cepter ZTE Cepter Nivo V2 27/100, Xgody X32 28/100.
| Cepter ZTE Cepter Nivo V2 | Xgody X32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | C | B |
| Durability score | 27/100 | 28/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 40.8 h | 25.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,900 mAh | 2,500 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 45 | 45 |
| Drop reliability class | D | D |
| Repairability index | 3.46/5 | 3.59/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP54 | IP44 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 5 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | Z2458 | X32 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.