Alldocube iPlay 60 Pad Pro vs PEAQ PET-10182-H332E
On the EU energy label the Alldocube iPlay 60 Pad Pro comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Alldocube iPlay 60 Pad Pro 42/100, PEAQ PET-10182-H332E 42/100.
| Alldocube iPlay 60 Pad Pro | PEAQ PET-10182-H332E | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | G | F |
| Durability score | 42/100 | 42/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 78.4 h | 60 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 25 |
| Drop reliability class | D | E |
| Repairability index | 3.35/5 | 3.59/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP42 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 7 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 20 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | T1201 | PET 10182-H332E |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.