vivo X Fold6 vs ZTE Salt A45s
On the EU energy label the vivo X Fold6 comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: vivo X Fold6 35/100, ZTE Salt A45s 33/100.
| vivo X Fold6 | ZTE Salt A45s | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 35/100 | 33/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 59 h | 56.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,670 mAh | 4,900 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 140 | 80 |
| Drop reliability class | B | D |
| Repairability index | 2.87/5 | 3.41/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP58 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | Yes | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | V2559 | Z2473 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.