ScreenBooster 1600XTS-25k vs VisionOwl Y1
The VisionOwl Y1 uses 9 kWh less a year, about €2 a year at the EU average price.
| ScreenBooster 1600XTS-25k | VisionOwl Y1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Annual consumption | 13.8 kWh | 5 kWh |
| Running cost (EU avg.) | €4/year | €1/year |
| Type | monitor | monitor |
| Screen size | 16″ | 16″ |
| Screen size | 40.6 cm | 39.7 cm |
| Resolution | 2560×1600 px | 1920×1080 px |
| Panel | LCD | LED LCD |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Power in SDR mode | 6.3 W | 2.3 W |
| Power in HDR mode | — | 3.4 W |
| Energy class (HDR) | — | A |
| Standby | 0.3 W | 0.2 W |
| Networked standby | — | 0 W |
| Automatic brightness control | No | No |
| Model numbers | 1600XTS-25k | Y1, V15FT, Y2, V-D15F |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.