Samsung Galaxy A26 5G vs vivo X300 Ultra
On the EU energy label the Samsung Galaxy A26 5G comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Samsung Galaxy A26 5G 44/100, vivo X300 Ultra 44/100.
| Samsung Galaxy A26 5G | vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | C | B |
| Durability score | 44/100 | 44/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 37.1 h | 56.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,860 mAh | 6,395 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 269 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | B | B |
| Repairability index | 3.22/5 | 3/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP67 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | SM-A266B/DS | V2562 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.