Philips S8310 vs POCO C81 Pro
On the EU energy label the POCO C81 Pro comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Philips S8310 46/100, POCO C81 Pro 46/100.
| Philips S8310 | POCO C81 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 46/100 | 46/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 47.6 h | 67.3 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,900 mAh | 5,880 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | B | A |
| Repairability index | 3.6/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 5 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | Philips S8310 | 25128PC17Y |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.