Kruger Matz EAGLE 1077 vs techBITE Smartboard III 12
On the EU energy label the techBITE Smartboard III 12 comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Kruger Matz EAGLE 1077 54/100, techBITE Smartboard III 12 55/100.
| Kruger Matz EAGLE 1077 | techBITE Smartboard III 12 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | E |
| Durability score | 54/100 | 55/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 82.3 h | 125.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 53 |
| Drop reliability class | E | D |
| Repairability index | 3.4/5 | 3.46/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP42 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 7 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 15 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | KM1077 | Smartboard III 12 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.