Invens ULTRA S25 vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
On the EU energy label the Xiaomi 17T Pro comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Invens ULTRA S25 21/100, Xiaomi 17T Pro 40/100.
| Invens ULTRA S25 | Xiaomi 17T Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 21/100 | 40/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 47.9 h | 70.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,830 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 60 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | D | B |
| Repairability index | 3/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 7 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | ULTRA S25 | 2602EPTC0G |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.