IIIF150 Air3 vs vivo X Fold6
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: IIIF150 Air3 35/100, vivo X Fold6 35/100.
| IIIF150 Air3 | vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | B |
| Durability score | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 45.1 h | 59 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,860 mAh | 6,670 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 140 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.15/5 | 2.87/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP58 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | Yes |
| Charging power | 30 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | AIR3 | V2559 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.