HONOR Magic8 pro vs Oppo Reno15 C 5G
On the EU energy label the Oppo Reno15 C 5G comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: HONOR Magic8 pro 57/100, Oppo Reno15 C 5G 55/100.
| HONOR Magic8 pro | Oppo Reno15 C 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 57/100 | 55/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 63.9 h | 67.7 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,600 charge cycles | 1,600 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,090 mAh | 6,310 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | B | C |
| Repairability index | 3.41/5 | 3.44/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | BKQ-N49 | CPH2801 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.