HONOR Magic8 Lite vs Motorola Razr fold
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: HONOR Magic8 Lite 67/100, Motorola Razr fold 67/100.
| HONOR Magic8 Lite | Motorola Razr fold | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 67/100 | 67/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 69 h | 59.3 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 7,330 mAh | 5,760 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 95 |
| Drop reliability class | A | C |
| Repairability index | 3.57/5 | 3.62/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 7 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP48 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | Yes |
| Charging power | 10 W | 90 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | MTN-NX1M | razr fold (XT2651-1) |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.