Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold vs Hotwav A25 Ultra
On the EU energy label the Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold 46/100, Hotwav A25 Ultra 39/100.
| Google Pixel 11 Pro Fold | Hotwav A25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | C |
| Durability score | 46/100 | 39/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 45.1 h | 45.5 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,658 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 210 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.57/5 | 3.15/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 7 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP42 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | Yes | No |
| Charging power | 7 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | GZDQ6 | A26 Ultra |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.