FOSSiBOT F118 vs TCL 60 SE
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 1 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: FOSSiBOT F118 43/100, TCL 60 SE 43/100.
| FOSSiBOT F118 | TCL 60 SE | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | B |
| Durability score | 43/100 | 43/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 97.1 h | 49.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 4,900 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | C | B |
| Repairability index | 2.66/5 | 3.44/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 33 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | F118 | T517H |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.