Cubot KINGKONG POWER 5 vs Oppo Reno16 F 5G
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Cubot KINGKONG POWER 5 74/100, Oppo Reno16 F 5G 74/100.
| Cubot KINGKONG POWER 5 | Oppo Reno16 F 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 74/100 | 74/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 148.1 h | 75 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,400 charge cycles | 1,800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 15,300 mAh | 6,325 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.13/5 | 3.82/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | KINGKONG POWER 5 | CPH2859 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.