Cubot KINGKONG POWER 5 vs Motorola Edge 70 fusion (XT2605-1)
On the EU energy label the Cubot KINGKONG POWER 5 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Cubot KINGKONG POWER 5 74/100, Motorola Edge 70 fusion (XT2605-1) 74/100.
| Cubot KINGKONG POWER 5 | Motorola Edge 70 fusion (XT2605-1) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 74/100 | 74/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 148.1 h | 57.7 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,400 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 15,300 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.13/5 | 3.63/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 6 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 68 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | KINGKONG POWER 5 | edge 70 fusion (XT2605-1) |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.