Acer AS10WF NEO vs HONOR Pad X8a (NDL-L09)
On the EU energy label the Acer AS10WF NEO comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Acer AS10WF NEO 51/100, HONOR Pad X8a (NDL-L09) 51/100.
| Acer AS10WF NEO | HONOR Pad X8a (NDL-L09) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | D | E |
| Durability score | 51/100 | 51/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 80.8 h | 128.6 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 8,200 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 3 |
| Drop reliability class | E | E |
| Repairability index | 3.2/5 | 3.12/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP20 | IP40 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | AS10WF NEO | NDL-L09 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.