Acepad HIGH E202 (EPREL 2454595) vs ZOOMSMART ZM800
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Acepad HIGH E202 (EPREL 2454595) 49/100, ZOOMSMART ZM800 49/100.
| Acepad HIGH E202 (EPREL 2454595) | ZOOMSMART ZM800 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | D |
| Durability score | 49/100 | 49/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 125.5 h | 75 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 11,700 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 52 | 82 |
| Drop reliability class | D | D |
| Repairability index | 3.35/5 | 2.97/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP67 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 7 | Mohs 8 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 15 W | 33 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | Acepad HIGH | ZM800 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.