TCL TAB A1 vs ZTE Blade X1001
On the EU energy label the ZTE Blade X1001 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: TCL TAB A1 49/100, ZTE Blade X1001 49/100.
| TCL TAB A1 | ZTE Blade X1001 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | F | D |
| Durability score | 49/100 | 49/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 95.5 h | 95.6 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 7,800 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 51 | 52 |
| Drop reliability class | E | E |
| Repairability index | 3.1/5 | 2.88/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP54 | IP42 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | 9425X | ZTE X1001 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.