REDMI Note 15 Pro 5G vs vivo Y21d (V2525)
On the EU energy label the vivo Y21d (V2525) comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: REDMI Note 15 Pro 5G 37/100, vivo Y21d (V2525) 44/100.
| REDMI Note 15 Pro 5G | vivo Y21d (V2525) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 37/100 | 44/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 60.8 h | 52.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,600 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,430 mAh | 5,060 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | B | B |
| Repairability index | 2.63/5 | 2.95/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | 25080RABDG | V2525 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.