REDMI 17 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: REDMI 17 5G 41/100, Samsung Galaxy A36 5G 41/100.
| REDMI 17 5G | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | C |
| Durability score | 41/100 | 41/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 78.3 h | 41.5 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 2,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 7,350 mAh | 4,905 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | B | C |
| Repairability index | 2.63/5 | 3.19/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP64 | IP67 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | 26062RN92G | SM-A366B/DS |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.