REDMAGIC 红魔11 Air vs Xiaomi 17
On the EU energy label the REDMAGIC 红魔11 Air comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: REDMAGIC 红魔11 Air 45/100, Xiaomi 17 45/100.
| REDMAGIC 红魔11 Air | Xiaomi 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 45/100 | 45/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 75.2 h | 64 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,780 mAh | 6,160 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 90 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | C | A |
| Repairability index | 3.36/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 80 W | 15 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | NX799J | 25113PN0EG |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.