raemond K50 EEA C vs ZTE Pad X1102N
On the EU energy label the ZTE Pad X1102N comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: raemond K50 EEA C 47/100, ZTE Pad X1102N 47/100.
| raemond K50 EEA C | ZTE Pad X1102N | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | F |
| Durability score | 47/100 | 47/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 5.5 h | 88.6 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,100 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 7,510 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 200 | 0 |
| Drop reliability class | B | E |
| Repairability index | 3.14/5 | 3.38/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP20 | IP42 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 21 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | K50 | X1102N |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.