POCO Pad M1 vs Ulefone UF1201RK1
On the EU energy label the POCO Pad M1 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: POCO Pad M1 58/100, Ulefone UF1201RK1 59/100.
| POCO Pad M1 | Ulefone UF1201RK1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | G | F |
| Durability score | 58/100 | 59/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 103.3 h | 91.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 11,800 mAh | 8,940 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 208 | 108 |
| Drop reliability class | A | C |
| Repairability index | 2.74/5 | 3.39/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP53 | IP42 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 18 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | 2509ARPBDG | Tab A12 Pro |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.