POCO F9 Pro vs REDMI 17C 5G
On the EU energy label the REDMI 17C 5G comes out ahead in 2 of the 2 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: POCO F9 Pro 35/100, REDMI 17C 5G 47/100.
| POCO F9 Pro | REDMI 17C 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 35/100 | 47/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 67.8 h | 69.6 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,160 mAh | 5,850 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 90 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | C | A |
| Repairability index | 2.63/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP64 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | 2607APCA5G | 2607FRNEAG |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.