POCO F8 Pro vs TCL K70 SE
On the EU energy label the POCO F8 Pro comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: POCO F8 Pro 37/100, TCL K70 SE 37/100.
| POCO F8 Pro | TCL K70 SE | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 37/100 | 37/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 62.7 h | 31.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 800 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,040 mAh | 2,880 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | B | B |
| Repairability index | 2.63/5 | 3.74/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 15 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | 2510DPC44G | T453D |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.