Philips S8320 vs Ulefone GQ5008AF3
On the EU energy label the Ulefone GQ5008AF3 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Philips S8320 58/100, Ulefone GQ5008AF3 58/100.
| Philips S8320 | Ulefone GQ5008AF3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 99.1 h | 113.6 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,200 mAh | 10,600 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | B | A |
| Repairability index | 3.6/5 | 3.2/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | Philips S8320 | Armor 27 Pro |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.