Oukitel C72 Pro vs vivo X300 FE (V2537)
On the EU energy label the Oukitel C72 Pro comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Oukitel C72 Pro 51/100, vivo X300 FE (V2537) 40/100.
| Oukitel C72 Pro | vivo X300 FE (V2537) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | B |
| Durability score | 51/100 | 40/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 67.8 h | 58.7 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,150 mAh | 6,350 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 191 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | B | C |
| Repairability index | 3.42/5 | 2.93/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP44 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 7 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 18 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | C72 Pro | V2537 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.