Oppo Pad 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (SM-X135F)
On the EU energy label the Oppo Pad 5 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Oppo Pad 5 56/100, Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (SM-X135F) 55/100.
| Oppo Pad 5 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (SM-X135F) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | F | D |
| Durability score | 56/100 | 55/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 104.2 h | 93.7 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 9,800 mAh | 4,980 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 10 | 104 |
| Drop reliability class | E | C |
| Repairability index | 3.49/5 | 2.72/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP40 | IP52 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | — |
| Model numbers | OPD2502, OPD2503 | SM-X135F |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.