Motorola Razr 70 ultra vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
On the EU energy label the Motorola Razr 70 ultra comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Motorola Razr 70 ultra 57/100, Xiaomi 17T Pro 40/100.
| Motorola Razr 70 ultra | Xiaomi 17T Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 57/100 | 40/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 51.4 h | 70.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,800 mAh | 6,830 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 95 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | C | B |
| Repairability index | 3.41/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP48 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | Yes | No |
| Charging power | 68 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | razr 70 ultra (XT2655-1) | 2602EPTC0G |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.