Motorola Razr 60 ultra vs POCO C81 Pro
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Motorola Razr 60 ultra 46/100, POCO C81 Pro 46/100.
| Motorola Razr 60 ultra | POCO C81 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 46/100 | 46/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 48.8 h | 67.3 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 4,540 mAh | 5,880 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 50 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | D | A |
| Repairability index | 3.42/5 | 2.63/5 |
| Repairability class | B | C |
| OS updates for at least | 6 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP48 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | No |
| Charging power | 68 W | 5 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | razr 60 ultra (XT2551-6) | 25128PC17Y |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.