Motorola G67 vs vivo Y21 5G (V2553)
On the EU energy label the vivo Y21 5G (V2553) comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Motorola G67 73/100, vivo Y21 5G (V2553) 57/100.
| Motorola G67 | vivo Y21 5G (V2553) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 73/100 | 57/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 59.4 h | 67.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,600 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 6,355 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | B | A |
| Repairability index | 4.09/5 | 2.98/5 |
| Repairability class | A | C |
| OS updates for at least | 7 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP64 | IP65 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 33 W | 44 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | g67 (XT2621-2) | V2553 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.