Hotwav TAB R9 Pro Max vs Lenovo Tab K12 (TB361FU)
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Hotwav TAB R9 Pro Max 67/100, Lenovo Tab K12 (TB361FU) 70/100.
| Hotwav TAB R9 Pro Max | Lenovo Tab K12 (TB361FU) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | C | F |
| Durability score | 67/100 | 70/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 413.4 h | 107.9 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 20,080 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 5 |
| Drop reliability class | B | E |
| Repairability index | 3.33/5 | 4.05/5 |
| Repairability class | C | A |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 7 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP52 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 20 W | 45 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | TAB R9 Pro Max | Tab K12 (TB361FU) |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.