Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro vs Oppo Find X9 Ultra
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro 62/100, Oppo Find X9 Ultra 62/100.
| Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro | Oppo Find X9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | E | A |
| Durability score | 62/100 | 62/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 64.6 h | 72.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,000 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,800 mAh | 6,890 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 180 |
| Drop reliability class | A | B |
| Repairability index | 3.72/5 | 3.62/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 20 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | Cyber 13 Pro | CPH2841 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.