Hotwav A25 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
On the EU energy label the Hotwav A25 Ultra comes out ahead in 3 of the 5 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: Hotwav A25 Ultra 39/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 39/100.
| Hotwav A25 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | C | A |
| Durability score | 39/100 | 39/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 45.5 h | 44.2 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 1,200 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 4,174 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 210 |
| Drop reliability class | B | A |
| Repairability index | 3.15/5 | 2.67/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 7 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP42 | IP48 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 1 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | Yes |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | A26 Ultra | SM-F776B |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.