HONOR MagicPad4 vs TCL TAB A1
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: HONOR MagicPad4 50/100, TCL TAB A1 49/100.
| HONOR MagicPad4 | TCL TAB A1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | G | F |
| Durability score | 50/100 | 49/100 |
| Device | tablet | tablet |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 90.1 h | 95.5 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,600 charge cycles | 1,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 7,800 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 5 | 51 |
| Drop reliability class | E | E |
| Repairability index | 3.31/5 | 3.1/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP40 | IP54 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 6 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | No |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 18 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | YLE-W09 | 9425X |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.