HONOR Magic8 Lite vs Oppo Reno15 C 5G
On the EU energy label the HONOR Magic8 Lite comes out ahead in 3 of the 4 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: HONOR Magic8 Lite 67/100, Oppo Reno15 C 5G 55/100.
| HONOR Magic8 Lite | Oppo Reno15 C 5G | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | B | A |
| Durability score | 67/100 | 55/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 69 h | 67.7 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,200 charge cycles | 1,600 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 7,330 mAh | 6,310 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | A | C |
| Repairability index | 3.57/5 | 3.44/5 |
| Repairability class | B | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 5 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Model numbers | MTN-NX1M | CPH2801 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.