HONOR 600 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy XCover7
On the EU energy label the Samsung Galaxy XCover7 comes out ahead in 2 of the 3 measured categories where the two differ. Durability score: HONOR 600 Pro 62/100, Samsung Galaxy XCover7 62/100.
| HONOR 600 Pro | Samsung Galaxy XCover7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 62/100 | 62/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 65.9 h | 41.4 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 1,600 charge cycles | 2,000 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 6,210 mAh | 3,950 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 270 | 270 |
| Drop reliability class | A | A |
| Repairability index | 3.27/5 | 3.67/5 |
| Repairability class | C | B |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 4 | Mohs 5 |
| User-replaceable battery | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 10 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | — | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | VKP-NX9 | SM-G556B |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.