Cyrus CM450XA vs vivo V70 (V2538)
The two devices are level: each is ahead in 2 of the measured categories where they differ. Durability score: Cyrus CM450XA 32/100, vivo V70 (V2538) 32/100.
| Cyrus CM450XA | vivo V70 (V2538) | |
|---|---|---|
| Energy class | A | A |
| Durability score | 32/100 | 32/100 |
| Device | smartphone | smartphone |
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Battery endurance per charge | 59.8 h | 65.1 h |
| Battery lasts at least | 800 charge cycles | 900 charge cycles |
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,320 mAh |
| Drops survived without defect | 180 | 90 |
| Drop reliability class | B | C |
| Repairability index | 3.08/5 | 3/5 |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| OS updates for at least | 5 years | 5 years |
| Dust & water protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Scratch resistance | Mohs 6 | Mohs 4 |
| User-replaceable battery | No | Yes |
| Foldable | No | No |
| Charging power | 10 W | 55 W |
| Charging port | USB-C | USB-C |
| Spare parts | priority parts listed | priority parts listed |
| Model numbers | CM450XA | V2538 |
Highlighted cells are better on that measure. Source: EU energy label register (EPREL); values as declared by the suppliers.